E-ISSN 2757-9204

Journal of Education and Research in Nursing

pdf
Optimists, Realists, and Traditionalists: Profiling Nursing Students' Engagement with Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Pediatric Nursing Education [J Educ Res Nurs]
J Educ Res Nurs. Ahead of Print: JERN-03064 | DOI: 10.14744/jern.2026.03064

Optimists, Realists, and Traditionalists: Profiling Nursing Students' Engagement with Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Pediatric Nursing Education

Pelin Karataş1, Demet Öztürk2
1Department of Pediatric Nursing, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Nursing, Aydın, Türkiye
2Department of Nursing, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Nursing, Aydın, Türkiye

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into nursing education; however, its use in pediatric nursing courses remains underexplored.
Aim: This study aimed to examine the use of artificial intelligence tools among nursing students enrolled in a pediatric nursing course and to identify homogenous student profiles based on their usage characteristics and theoretical adoption patterns.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 241 nursing students enrolled in a pediatric nursing course. Data were collected using the AI in Pediatric Nursing Course Questionnaire and the General Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS). K-means cluster analysis was conducted, guided by Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory, to classify students into distinct profiles based on their GAAIS subscale scores, which were considered to reflect their fundamental attitudinal orientations toward AI.
Results: Cluster analysis identified three distinct student profiles: Optimists (n=95), Realists (n=102), and Traditionalists (n=44). Optimists demonstrated the highest levels of AI use, whereas Traditionalists demonstrated the lowest levels in both clinical practice (p=0.002) and preparation for clinical visits (p=0.039). Additionally, Optimists and Realists reported more positive perceptions of AI’s impact on examination success (p=0.002) and learning (p=0.001), whereas Traditionalists expressed significantly more negative attitudes toward AI overall (p<0.001) and reported the lowest levels of trust in the technology (p=0.040).
Conclusion: Optimists and Realists appear to actively integrate AI tools into clinical practice and examination preparation and generally perceive them as beneficial for learning outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of adopting differentiated pedagogical approaches rather than a one-size-fits-all curriculum.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence, Diffusion of Innovations Theory, education, nursing practice, nursing, Optimists, pediatrics, Realists, Traditionalists


Corresponding Author: Pelin Karataş
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE


Journal Metrics

Journal Citation Indicator: 0.18
CiteScore: 1.1
Source Normalized Impact
per Paper:
0.22
SCImago Journal Rank: 0.348

Quick Search

© 2026 Journal of Education and Research in Nursing. All rights reserved for the website content. Articles published in this journal are licensed under a CC BY-NC license.



Kare Publishing is a subsidiary of Kare Media.